Search for: All records

The cross-sectional area of myelinated axons increases greatly during postnatal development in mammals and is an important influence on axonal conduction velocity. This radial growth is driven primarily by an accumulation of neurofilaments, which are cytoskeletal polymers that serve a space-filling function in axons. Neurofilaments are assembled in the neuronal cell body and transported into axons along microtubule tracks. The maturation of myelinated axons is accompanied by an increase in neurofilament gene expression and a decrease in neurofilament transport velocity, but the relative contributions of these processes to the radial growth are not known. Here, we address this question by computational modeling of the radial growth of myelinated motor axons during postnatal development in rats. We show that a single model can explain the radial growth of these axons in a manner consistent with published data on axon caliber, neurofilament and microtubule densities, and neurofilament transport kinetics in vivo. We find that the increase in the cross-sectional area of these axons is driven primarily by an increase in the influx of neurofilaments at early times and by a slowing of neurofilament transport at later times. We show that the slowing can be explained by a decline in the microtubule density. 

Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are emerging drug targets for many diseases, including cancer, autoimmunity, and neurological disorders. A high degree of structural similarity between their catalytic domains, however, has hindered the development of selective pharmacological agents. Our previous research uncovered two unfunctionalized terpenoid inhibitors that selectively inhibit PTP1B over T-cell PTP (TCPTP), two PTPs with high sequence conservation. Here, we use molecular modeling, with supporting experimental validation, to study the molecular basis of this unusual selectivity. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations suggest that PTP1B and TCPTP share a h-bond network that connects the active site to a distal allosteric pocket; this network stabilizes the closed conformation of the catalytically essential WPD loop, which it links to the L–11 loop and neighboring α3 and α7 helices on the other side of the catalytic domain. Terpenoid binding to either of two proximal C-terminal sites─an α site and a β site─can disrupt the allosteric network; however, binding to the α site forms a stable complex only in PTP1B. In TCPTP, two charged residues disfavor binding at the α site in favor of binding at the β site, which is conserved between the two proteins. Our findings thus indicate that minor amino acid differences at the poorly conserved α site enable selective binding, a property that might be enhanced with chemical elaboration, and illustrate more broadly how minor differences in the conservation of neighboring─yet functionally similar─allosteric sites can affect the selectivity of inhibitory scaffolds (e.g., fragments).